Just short answers to your questions: >>>> -> symbolic name of the statistic producer (0MQ node) >>>> -> sub-symbolic name of the statistic producer (0MQ node) > why not just a name? why is a two level hierarchy exposed at this level?
Just for aggregation purposes - the stuff may be written into a database for later work ... I could also life with one name, where I concatenate two names before sending and do the reverse work at the collector. We also consider putting even more complicated data into that statistic-"telegram" and serialize them via TNetString (or other fast serialize methods NOT like JSON or XML). What I actually do not like very much: white spaces as seperators in specifications. Marten _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
