On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > b) patch the code to provide a socket option that treats connecting as > > though the pipe is full. > > Best. > Agreed - this is definitely the nice way to go. > Actually I don't see the benefit of a round robin using connecting > pipes while others are still active, so this might even tread in bug > territory. This is right. Please, file an issue with test cases (a C test case > ideally), and lets fix this. If you want a work around in the > meantime, use a variant on the LRU model. > > -Pieter This is slightly complicated by the fact that either you'd have a massive backwards compatability/expectation change (connect()ed sockets block on first send() in many cases) or you'd have a disparity between the first connection, and subsequent connections, which feels weird. Ian
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
