On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Sebastian Lauwers <[email protected]> wrote:
> Checking the zeromq 3.2 RC [1], I see this still hasn't been > applied---I don't know what the project's policy would be regarding > "breaking" the 3.2 API after the first RC has been released. > Constness is used a handful of times in zmq.h. Breaking the C API is a bad idea, no matter what the version numbering. I'd suggest leaving the C API as is, and improving the C++ API (in https://github.com/zeromq/cppzmq). -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
