On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Andrew Hume <[email protected]> wrote:
> i propose that you should need to zmq_close, and furthermore, > that you need to zmq_close a msg you have zmq_msg_init()ed > in the case you do not do a zmq_recv on it. Fully agreed. Any constructor should be matched with a destructor. It's a shame the API didn't take more care with object lifecycles. Would you like to make a patch to the documentation (libzmq, then). -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
