On 8 September 2012 21:20, Maninder Batth <[email protected]> wrote: > The website says, zmqpp is a high level c++ binding. Does that comes at a > higher performance? Are there any benchmarks comparing cppzmq vs zmqpp? > Any future plans on merging the two? > > Thank you, > Jim >
zmqpp is about 5%, give or take, slower than the c native bindings last time I checked. I don't know how this compares to cppzmq but I'd imagine it's slower as cppzmq is a very lightweight wrapper over the native bindings and probably runs without much loss of performance at all. So far zmqpp only gets update when someone asks for a feature or there is something else I need it to do for work, but if there is anything you need just let me know. I doubt there is any plan to merge the two as bindings have, for the most part, been kept separate from zmq core. Regards, Ben _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
