On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Michael Haberler <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think such informal description is inadaequate for a independent protocol > implementation... if the goal is interoperability then there is a missing protocol specification layer, above ZMTP, for each socket type, based on the zmq_socket man page. The key things aren't REQ/REP state, nor framing, which are simple. It's the routing and HWM strategies for each socket type, and the zmq_socket man page does describe these explicitly, Note however that REQ and REP are not visible at the protocol level. They are pure API semantics. They're built on DEALER and ROUTER respectively. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
