On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Thomas S Hatch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The Salt team are the guys that are pushing zeromq packages to a lot of > > distributions I should ask, should we be telling our package maintainers > to > > distribute zeromq 3? All the packagers are still on 2 > > Yes, you should be at least testing heavily on the last 3.2rc1, and on > master, which will soon be cut as rc2. > > -Pieter > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > Thanks Pieter, Almost all of our users are running whatever ZeroMQ is distributed with the platforms. We are always pushing the maintainers to update to the latest stable in the series. The other problem is that these issues seem very erratic and hard to track down. I have a very difficult time reproducing them when them happen, but I do have some notes on it and a few ways to reproduce it. I will be in touch with you guys on this.
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
