On Oct 22, 2012, at 14:08 , Pieter Hintjens wrote: > Merijn, it makes sense but you don't really need to convince anyone. > Simply write an issue where you state the lack of identity checking as > a problem, try fixing this in the code, send a patch, see what > happens. > Since we're pretty much done with stable 3.2, it's a good time to do > experiments. My advice is to make small, careful steps and get > feedback through running code rather than up-front discussion. > > If you make disruptive changes that annoy people, they'll simply patch > them away. > > Enjoy! > -Piieter
Ok, I'm just used to project being more conservative about wanting people to submit patches for large features :) I'll play around and see how far I can get... -- Merijn _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
