Can you reopen the issue, please? Thanks...
On Nov 15, 2012 7:23 PM, "Balázs Varga" <[email protected]> wrote:

> My test case still fails, I think #471 didn't addressed this issue, see
> Adrien last comment at https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-450
>
> b.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> 450 is also fixed afaics; at least the test case didn't pass before
>> and does pass now. But best to double-check...
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Lourens Naudé
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-384 is most definitely fixed,
>> however
>> > I need to take another look @ https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-450at
>> > the end of my day.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Lourens,
>> >>
>> >> Nice. I've backported that to 3.2rc. Can you confirm that it's these
>> two
>> >> issues:
>> >>
>> >> https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-450
>> >> https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-384
>> >>
>> >> ? thanks
>> >> Piete
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Lourens Naudé
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > Fixed in https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/pull/471
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Balazs,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This is a known issue I think. The code refers to strings which are
>> >> >> freed. I suspect we'll have to store these in the socket object.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -Pieter
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Balázs Varga <[email protected]>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Hello,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > zmq_socket_monitor(3) disconnect event sometimes gives back a
>> wrong
>> >> >> > address.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I tried to create a test case, which seems to reproduce this
>> issue,
>> >> >> > you
>> >> >> > can
>> >> >> > find it here:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > https://gist.github.com/4068920#
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > regards
>> >> >> > balazs
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >> > zeromq-dev mailing list
>> >> >> > [email protected]
>> >> >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> >> >> [email protected]
>> >> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > zeromq-dev mailing list
>> >> > [email protected]
>> >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > zeromq-dev mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to