Time to discuss this on #zeromq irc now?
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/27/12 14:57, Ian Barber wrote: >> So, for an example you might want to look at how Mongrel2 handles this >> kind of thing. Messages flow across ZeroMQ with a connection ID and a >> body, and get written to the appropriate HTTP connection. So, basically, >> don't use SND_MORE to handle the stream, send each part individually, >> and include a connection identifier as a message part within each one. >> As Michel says, multipart messages are delivered atomically so they wont >> give you the behaviour you are looking for, pooling or not. > > So the messages for the solution with the lowest latency look something > like: > > [Envelope + MessageId, DataPart] > > Where the triplet is send atomically and the workers below it > reconstruct the messages as Michel suggested? (Given that the messages > arrive in incremental order.) > > > Stefan > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
