Thanks Peter!
BTW
Regarding question 2 below, is my concern unfounded? I think I should be fine
but I just want to make sure...
>I have two questions:
>1. I don't understand the error message above: how does accessing the value of
>variable n have anything to >do with the internals of ZMQ?
>2. Is it possible for the compiler to rearrange the machine instructions such
>that the assignment of value >of n (i.e. *n=4; *n += 2;) occurs after the
>message has been sent and received on the other thread? In >this case, is it
>possible for the program to output any value other than '6' for 'n'?
________________________________
From: Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]>
To: Kah-Chan Low <[email protected]>; ZeroMQ development list
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] inproc: passing an object pointer between threads
causing datarace?? (3.2.2 stable release)
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Kah-Chan Low <[email protected]> wrote:
> This error can not be suppressed by using CPPFLAGS=-DZMQ_MAKE_VALGRIND_HAPPY
> to build zmq.
There's a valgrind suppression file, attached. You should be able to
add the exception you need to this.
-Pieter
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
