Excellent. Thanks very much for the clarification Pieter. On 31/12/2012 8:21 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > Hi Michael, > > The spec is accurate; XPUB/XSUB are not visible on the wire, they are > API constructs. Whether you use PUB or XPUB, the wire protocol is the > same, and uses the PUB socket type. Ditto for XSUB/SUB. I've added a > note to the RFC page to clarify this. > > There are no undocumented changes to the protocol. If you find any, > those would be considered bugs. > > -Pieter > > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Michael Compton > <[email protected]> wrote: >> The spec does not refer to the xpub/xsub which are now available. >> >> I would edit but I am not totally confident I understand fully the semantics >> for the sockets, i.e. which other sockets are allowed to connect. >> >> Also has there been any other undocumented changes to the protocol? >> >> Spec link: >> http://rfc.zeromq.org/spec:15 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
