On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]> wrote:
> My goal was to allow at some point to substitute the user-space > implementation (ZeroMQ) by kernel-space implementation without breaking > applications too badly. Given that ZeroMQ is now evolving towards being a > simple user-space async I/O library, similar to say Boost.Asio, rather than > towards being part of the networking stack, using a non-standard API is > perfectly OK. It's a valid technical vision, and hopefully will come true one day, but it does seem to have been painful for users since the POSIX networking APIs really aren't designed for messaging. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
