Hi, My guess was it might have an issue on libzmq (zeromq c library) when large messages were heavily sent.
Thanks Min On Jan 26, 2013, at 4:01 PM, Ritesh Adval <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Min, > > Thanks for the update.Just to confirm, > Are you saying that this issue is on zeromq c library or jzmq c wrapper? > > Just an update that when I replaced > DEALER socket which connects to ROUTER socket of broker with REQ socket and > replaced DEALER socket which connects to DEALER socket of broker with REP > socket, then I do not see message loss when doing the same test. (REQ socket > does "send" and then "recv" and REP does opposite "recv" and "send") > > -Ritesh > Sent from my iPhone. > > > On Jan 25, 2013, at 8:42 PM, Min <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I was able to reproduce the issue on jzmq even on zeromq 3.2.2. >> >> What I discovered is about last 30K bytes of 45K message was not sometimes >> delivered to in-router on raw close. >> I didn't build equivalent C code, as jzmq is a thin wrapper of native C >> library it could have the same problem. >> >> But I didn't find a clear solution yet. >> >> Thanks >> Min >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Ritesh Adval <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have created a bug for this issue with instructions and java test case. >> Its at https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-497 >> >> Thanks >> Ritesh >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Ritesh Adval <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks Min, >> >> I will create a bug with instruction and unit test. I was also experimenting >> with Java only version of zeromq (https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq). When >> running same test it does not drop message but has some other issue. >> >> -Ritesh >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Min <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ritesh, >> >> If you can reproduce the problem, Java code should be fine. >> >> Community could look into it. >> >> Thanks >> Min >> >> 2013년 1월 17일 목요일에 Ritesh Adval님이 작성: >> >> Hi Charles, >> >> I have test program in JAVA, I am not a C programmer so i will probably take >> me time to reproduce this in C. Can someone first take a look at my JAVA >> program to see if I am not doing anything stupid. Should I create bug and >> attach Java maven project? >> Its very easy to run it, all you need is zeromq 2.2.0 installed and jzmq >> built and installed by building jzmq (https://github.com/zeromq/jzmq). >> I can add instructions to the bug report. Once confirmed that program looks >> right I can try to create a C version of the test but will take me some time. >> >> let me know. >> >> Thanks >> Ritesh >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Charles Remes <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Jan 16, 2013, at 4:08 PM, Ritesh Adval <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hi Charles, >> > >> > Yes I close the socket in my thread after sending 100 messages, and I >> > expect that LINGER will make sure messages are sent to the other end, I >> > expected that context termination will block and make sure any pending >> > messages are sent, but thats not happening. context termination returns >> > quickly. >> > >> > Just now tried again in my unit test by setting LINGER to >> > Integer.MAX_VALUE explicitly in all my sockets and ran the test again and >> > it did fail with messages getting dropped. >> > >> > The interesting thing is only the 100th message (The last one) from some >> > of my concurrent threads are getting dropped. >> >> Time to show someone the code. That's the easiest way to figure it out. If >> you can reproduce this in C, that will get a lot more attention. >> >> Here's how to open an issue: >> >> http://www.zeromq.org/docs:issue-tracking >> >> cr >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
