Hi Doron, Oh, I see - sorry for assuming things. Sounds really cool, I'll start to play with it. Would you say that the IOCP branch is stable enough to have a go at?
Niels On 3 March 2013 11:04, Doron Somech <[email protected]> wrote: > netmq is a complete native port of libzmq. native code has some advantage > over using pinvoke (memory management, debugging, better support for > different environments). Also implementing some specific improvements > should be easier in .net environment, like IO Completion ports (which I > already implemented but didn't merge into the main branch > https://github.com/somdoron/netmq/tree/IOCP), SSL/TLS and I also have in > mind WebSockets as new transport. > > Doron > > On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Niels Berglund < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > NetMQ is like JeroMQ, a single-language (C#, Java) reimplementation of >> > libzmq that aims to be compatible with the higher level APIs. It >> > should make it much easier for developers to get started. >> >> Thanks Pieter, but isn't the same true for clrzmq, (at the end of the day >> we're doing P/Invoke calls into libzmq)? I.e. why would I choose one over >> the other (other than personal preferences I mean). >> >> Niels >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
