Hmm...but messages are not sent in the context(I don't mean zmq context here) of the calling thread, right? So, how can one use stack variable for message object?
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Mohit Jaggi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I understand, but the caller does not control if the message is stored in > > VSM or on heap(since choice is made inside zmq code). So zmq has to > somehow > > copy the VSM before the message variable goes out of scope. Just want to > > confirm that zmq does that. > > Or is it not OK to use zmq_msg_t on stack and it should always be > allocated > > on heap? > > You're over-thinking it. The VSM data is just a property of zmq_msg_t > like size and has the same scope / lifetime as the message object. > > You can use either stack or heap depending on your use case. > > -Pieter > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
