Here are 2 articles that I find interesting: http://james-iry.blogspot.gr/2009/04/erlang-style-actors-are-all-about.html http://james-iry.blogspot.gr/2009/04/erlang-style-actors-are-all-about_16.html
2013/4/8 Eric Hill <[email protected]> > Agreed. The term deadlock usually indicates two bits of code contending > for the same resource. In a message-oriented system, the message becomes > the resource, and since one bit of code always hands the resource off to > another bit of code, that type of deadlock cannot happen. > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:22 PM, A. Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes that could happen, I would say that would not be considered a >> deadlock in a classic sense. That's more like a protocol design flaw, >> you're blocked on a message. >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Timothee Besset <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I've also had deadlock cases where two threads would use several zmq >>> sockets to communicate with each other (for instance with both a REP/REQ >>> and a PAIR) >>> >>> It's easy in those cases to have deadlocks, unless you use a poll to >>> wait on all of them at the same time. >>> >>> TTimo >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Garrett Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:52 AM, A. Mark <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > Yes I agree, I've not had a single deadlock in a classic sense since >>>> using >>>> > message queues. But this statement is like saying I've hand not a car >>>> > accident since I've been riding a bike. You can still lock up your >>>> code but >>>> > it will not be a classic deadlock. I guess you could incorrectly code >>>> > something with message queues and have it lock up occasionally. >>>> >>>> The one area I keep an eye on in shared-nothing single threaded >>>> applications is accidentally waiting on one's self -- this is easy to >>>> do, but also easy to detect and fix! >>>> >>>> Garrett >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > -- Sincerely yours, Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
