On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Evan Gates <[email protected]> wrote:
> Out of curiosity, why don't calls that take ownership also nullify a > reference? It would be nicer if they did this but it didn't occur to me. :-) I've added this language to CLASS, our style guide: "A method may take ownership of an object instance and then act as a destructor of the object instance at some later stage. In that case the method SHALL use the same style as the destructor." I don't like breaking APIs but this seems like a good improvement to the CZMQ API so if you want to make those changes, go for it. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
