Interesting results and nice graphs. FYI, the RabbitMQ blog considers some more complex scenarios that might be of interest for further comparisons (see http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2012/04/17/rabbitmq-performance-measurements-part-1/, http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2012/04/25/rabbitmq-performance-measurements-part-2/ ).
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: > It's funny how the scale is 200-20,000 messages. It would be fun to > repeat the same test with 200,000-20M messages... > > Nice benchmark, I hope we see more of these realistic comparisons. > > -Pieter > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Bjorn Reese <[email protected]> > wrote: > > This may interest you: > > > > > http://x-aeon.com/wp/2013/04/10/a-quick-message-queue-benchmark-activemq-rabbitmq-hornetq-qpid-apollo/ > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
