I ran your tests on my Linux machine (amd64 Ubuntu 12.04, 12 GB RAM, i7 930), in case you are interested in more numbers
(everything from git master) jzmq: It took 2.574 seconds to process 2000000 messages of size 10 Byte(s) in a batch 777000.7770007771 messages/second It took 1.856 seconds to process 500000 messages of size 1.0 KiloByte(s) in a batch 269396.5517241379 messages/second It took 2.673 seconds to process 125000 messages of size 10.0 KiloByte(s) in a batch 46763.93565282454 messages/second jeromq: It took 1.33 seconds to process 2000000 messages of size 10 Byte(s) in a batch 1503759.3984962406 messages/second It took 2.129 seconds to process 500000 messages of size 1.0 KiloByte(s) in a batch 234852.04321277596 messages/second It took 3.014 seconds to process 125000 messages of size 10.0 KiloByte(s) in a batch 41473.12541473126 messages/second PyZMQ (CPython 2.7 + Cython) It took 1.382134 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 10 Byte(s) in a batch 108527.827258 messages/second It took 1.627566 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 1.0 Kilobyte(s) in a batch 92162.1611658 messages/second It took 2.618599 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 10.0 Kilobyte(s) in a batch 57282.539251 messages/second PyZMQ (PyPy 2.0b + CFFI) It took 1.614755 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 10 Byte(s) in a batch 92893.3491458 messages/second It took 1.674885 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 1.0 Kilobyte(s) in a batch 89558.3875908 messages/second It took 4.030202 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 10.0 Kilobyte(s) in a batch 37218.9781058 messages/second Making a few runs, most of these numbers fluctuate by about 10-20% (I couldn't run labview) -Min RK On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:08 PM, crocket <crockabisc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Anyhow, jzmq is somewhat slower than JeroMQ when processing small messages. > The slowness that accompnies 10K messages was partly due to using swap > space on HDD. > > > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:38 PM, crocket <crockabisc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> There is a DEALER that sends messages and receives identical messages in >> a batch. >> >> There is the ROUTER that just sends back what it receives to the sender. >> >> I tested JeroMQ, labview-zmq, jzmq, and PyZMQ. >> >> The test source code is at >> https://github.com/crocket/ZeroMQThroughputTest >> >> To summarize the test results on a windows xp sp3 32bit system with 3GB >> RAM, >> for messages of 10 bytes, JeroMQ >> jzmq >>> PyZMQ >>> labview-zmq >> for messages of 1 kilobytes, JeroMQ = jzmq = PyZMQ >>> labview-zmq >> for messages of 10 kilobytes, JeroMQ = jzmq = PyZMQ = labview-zmq >> >> Below are the test results. >> >> Why is labview-zmq so slow when sending small messages? >> It's just a wrapper around libzmq like jzmq and PyZMQ. >> >> 1) JeroMQ >> >> It took 1.59 seconds to process 600000 messages of size 10 Byte(s) in a >> batch >> 376411.54 messages/second >> >> It took 35.81 seconds to process 600000 messages of size 1.0 KiloByte(s) >> in a batch >> 16754.16 messages/second >> >> It took 304.89 seconds to process 600000 messages of size 10.0 >> KiloByte(s) in a batch >> 1967.92 messages/second >> >> 2) jzmq >> >> It took 4.63 seconds to process 600000 messages of size 10 Byte(s) in a >> batch >> 129729.73 messages/second >> >> It took 34.30 seconds to process 600000 messages of size 1.0 KiloByte(s) >> in a batch >> 17494.75 messages/second >> >> It took 48.36 seconds to process 100000 messages of size 10.0 KiloByte(s) >> in a batch >> 2067.82 messages/second >> (If I try to send 600,000 messages of 10 kilobytes in a batch, it says >> "not enough space".) >> >> 3) PyZMQ >> >> It took 6.51 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 10Byte(s) in a >> batch >> 23021.58 messages/second >> >> It took 8.78 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 1.0Kilobyte(s) in >> a batch >> 17081.85 messages/second >> >> It took 73.78 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 10.0Kilobyte(s) >> in a batch >> 2033.03 messages/second >> >> 4) labview-zmq >> >> It took 11.79 seconds to process 40000 messages of size 10Byte(s) in a >> batch >> 3390.73 messages/second >> >> It took 13.70 seconds to process 40000 messages of size 1.0Kilobyte(s) in >> a batch >> 2919.04 messages/second >> >> It took 20.67 seconds to process 40000 messages of size 10.0Kilobyte(s) >> in a batch >> 1935 messages/second >> > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
