Hi, In a benchmark, jeromq didn't have severe performance degration. http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/18960
I would be happy if you test on both systems. You don't need to change your application whichever you use. Thanks Min 2013년 5월 25일 토요일에 Erwin Karbasi님이 작성: > Siam Rafiee <siamraf <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > What container are you using to bring up the applications? The JVM won't > let you load the same native library from different classloaders. You'll > need to ensure the library is loaded in a parent classloader, available to > both application classloaders. For example, in Tomcat you would achieve > this > by placing the jzmq jar in 'tomcat/lib' and the native libraries in > 'tomcat/bin'. > > > > > > You might find it easier to swap out JZMQ for JeroMQ > (https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq), which is a pure Java implementation > with > no need for native libraries. > > > > Siam > > > > > > On 24 May 2013 12:51, Erwin Karbasi <erwin <at> optinity.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hello Guys, > > Following our use cases: > > > > 1. We have two applications that packaged the SO file (C lib files) and > JZMQ.jar as part of the applications jar. > > We have tried to deploy these apps on the same JVM and encountered > following error: > > > > > > java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: > > jzmq (Not found in java.library.path) > > > > 2. We have also tried to set the lib files in the LD_LIBERARY_PATH > (instead of above approach of packaging the lib as part of the application > jar) and use separate Context object per application on the same JVM but we > came across following error: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: > > jzmq (Library is already loaded in another ClassLoader) > > > > > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibraryWithPath(ClassLoader.java:1053) > > > > > > at > java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibraryWithClassLoader(ClassLoader.java:1017) > > > > > > at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:474) > > > > > > at org.zeromq.ZMQ.<clinit>(ZMQ.java:36) > > > > > > Your insight regarding above two issues would highly appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > Erwin Karbasi > > > > > > AT&T, Senior Software Architect > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing listzeromq-dev <at> > lists.zeromq.orghttp://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > zeromq-dev <at> lists.zeromq.org > > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > Hello Siam, > > Thanks a lot for fast turnaround response. > > I'm using WebSphere application server. > > 1. I know that if I'll add the library as a shared lib to the JVM I can use > two Context object in the same JVM, but is it possible to add the > LD_LIBERARY_PATH to the machine properties or using -Djava.lib.path as > property of the JVM and to create two separate Context on separate app > deployed on the same JVM? > > 2. I'd happy to use the JeroMQ, but as I know its performance is not a same > as JZMQ and it could degrade the messaging performance significantly. > > Thanks, > Erwin > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:;> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
