The timeout depends on heartbeating, and decreasing the timeout requires faster heartbeating. You can certainly do that and get slightly faster response in case of failure, at the cost of extra traffic. It'd be a good trade-off for clustering, but maybe less important for clients.
-Pieter On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Laurent Alebarde <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi list, > > I wonder why in the "Lazy Pirate client", the REQUEST_TIMEOUT parameter is > requested to be at least 1,000 ms ? I understand a reasonable minimum time > is required to avoid false positives, but it seems hugely long, no ? It > depends also on the transport. > > Cheers, > > > Laurent. > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
