On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Ian Barber <[email protected]> wrote:
> One thing to plausibly consider is making the identity generation algorithm > part of the spec (perhaps optionally). Like I wrote, identities are today a purely API-level abstraction and the protocol just provides a way to break the abstraction for the occasional case where it's profitable. I'm not sure what problems we have with this today but collecting those would be a good way to see what changes we should make to the concepts, if any. > The other general niggle I have is reusability of this onto PGM/UDP/IPC. For PGM, I'm not sure how to leverage what we have in ZMTP 3.0. For IPC, it's the same protocol and that should be clear in the text. For UDP, if we're not too worried about loss, or security, or larger messages, we can make a mapping rather nicely. I've done this before as an experiment. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
