-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Agreed that the green poller misses the point.
Brian On 06/25/2013 11:16 AM, Min RK wrote: > I wouldn't actually recommend using the green poller, it seems to > miss the point. I would use a plain greenlet for each socket if > possible. > > -MinRK > > On Jun 25, 2013, at 11:04, Brian Knox <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > (sorry about the new thread - was working on moving my email to a > different provider in the middle of this) > > Min - I merged the poll request on my little laptop and gave it a > spin. Before your pull request: > > > mps: 28066 mps: 28116 mps: 29745 mps: 28912 mps: 28679 > > after your pull request: > > mps: 78138 mps: 78364 mps: 78411 mps: 78065 mps: 78175 > > Excellent. > > By the way, just for fun I imported zmq.green instead of zmq > without changing anything else > > mps: 24738 mps: 24779 mps: 24759 mps: 24630 mps: 24702 > > And it's performance is well below straight zmq Poller. > > > Thanks for the quick patch! > > Brian >> _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev >> mailing list [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing > list [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRybVaAAoJEAIP2j2QzUp7ZP8H+wT8i+sieO1guLQDvfYc2DdI QcYDO3BQhDJ+VIdRJ04hxNSXjKtk1s+ZKvr0c41w0m0wLvXBQJyi3mfQEi14hLb6 Olc3DpsIC3iZFb0dsECUzwzmHyL1rHco952Ol8BB4IGflFL/5/lOPT2BNrc8nq3y RWyy/ptUbMPWjwMju+i9c1NI2Eeyd2y6/Q4GQPU7Pt6su07XsY/o6VMGd2X8LSPP ERM8dE9JwwFgXaqUO3JpIMy3ET23BgKpr1/+bOFQgqRnab8a2BGEVKFzCOeVpidN Fs61etvgNHDN1z3auOPy1uCVnlOOxZeO1bwaYowlFSeA1ip206xZ5B/8yXoibYE= =EAH5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
