Merijn, thanks for catching that error in the grammar. I've fixed it.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Martin Hurton <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Merijn, you are right, the implementation is still not complete. > Plan to finish it soon. > > - Martin > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Merijn Verstraaten > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I grabbed the most recent master of libzmq from github, but it doesn't seem >> to follow the ABNF specified in RFC 23? Specifically, the ABNF states: >> >> ; A command is a single long or short frame >> command = command-size frame-body >> command-size = %x04 short-size | %x06 long-size >> >> I'm assuming the "frame-body" is a typo that should be "command-body" >> instead, since frame-body is undefined, but command-body is defined later. >> Clearly a command should start with either %x04 or %x06, but when I listen >> on a socket the libzmq implementation has a %x00 in that position, so either >> the ABNF is wrong in specifying %x04 as the indicator for short-size, or the >> implementation is sending out the wrong value. >> >> Cheers, >> Merijn >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
