On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Lucas Hope <[email protected]> wrote:

> Why was the project changed from ZAPI again? I kinda like the name CL-ZAPI
> vs CL-CZMQ. But I'm happy to go with the more useful name.

We wanted to make it consistent with other bindings, rather than act
as a special case.

IMO you could just call your binding CLZMQ, and make it a replacement
for the existing cl-zmq.

-Pieter
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to