On 23 August 2013 14:37, Steven McCoy <[email protected]> wrote: > > - On very small (<40 byte) TCP messages and inproc messages, ZeroMQ is > faster (30-40%) than Nitro; Nitro's use of mutex/cond on socket queues > probably costs it there. > > I'm seeing atypical pthread mutex usage in the code-base, it is trivial to optimise with an adaptive mutex and further improvements are usually available with members of the spin lock family.
-- Steve-o
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
