I remember when Nathan Marz was filing bug reports and asking questions on this list to help get things stabilized. Oh wait, no I don't because as far as I know he never did any of those things.
I think 3.3+ works pretty well for a lot of people. This is common with open source software so I wouldn't read too much into it. Nathan preferred to roll his own with Netty. I hope he succeeds. cr On Aug 26, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Andy Pook <[email protected]> wrote: > comment from Nathan Marz in a presentation called "Lessons Learned Building > Storm" > > http://www.infoq.com/presentations/storm-lessons > 42:50 > > Q: “What do you think about the ZeroMQ library?” > > A: pause… It saved a lot of time initially. Then we ran into a lot of > problems > with it. A lot of limitations. So we’re actually getting rid of ZeroMQ in > Storm … We’re replacing ZeroMQ with Netty. A lot of problems I had with > ZeroMQ > were, like, a lot of weird stuff with the community … Lots of regression in > the code. Nothing above 2.1.7 works … It just a weird, very unstable piece of > software. It could have been a really awesome library. But it just has all > these weird problems with it. > > > Thoughts? > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
