On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:32 AM, MinRK <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks. By closed, you mean the connecting peer (client) should be > closed, > > or the inner pipe on the server side? What should be the user-visible > > symptoms of failed authentication, both on the client side and the server > > side, if any? I'm looking to add a failed-auth test to test_security, > but it > > is unclear to me what the expected behavior is. Is the symptom only that > > messages sent do not arrive, or should sending a message not succeed in > the > > first place? > > I think the net result of a failed authentication should be the same > as if there was no network connection; no pipes created on either side > of the connection, and no route to or from the unauthenticated client. > Thanks - so as far as the connecter is concerned, it is as if the peer is unavailable, and for the binder, it is as if nobody connected. > > -Pieter > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
