Yes, with this modification, it works.

Thanks Richard.

Le 11/09/2013 15:56, [email protected] a écrit :

Actually, looks like I may have screwed up the makefile, not sure how the CI build worked.

Can you try adding

test_ctx_destroy_SOURCES = test_ctx_destroy.cpp

above the test_security_null_SOURCES line in Makefile.am, see if that works.

I don't really use make, so am winging it.

Ric.


Inactive
          hide details for "Laurent Alebarde" ---11/09/2013
          02:52:15 PM---Yes, I did. In fact, I tried a full install from
          scrat"Laurent Alebarde" ---11/09/2013 02:52:15 PM---Yes, I did. In fact, I tried a full install from scratch in a new test  directory :

From: "Laurent Alebarde" <[email protected]>
To: "ZeroMQ development list" <[email protected]>,
Date: 11/09/2013 02:52 PM
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] cannot build last libzmq from Git
Sent by: [email protected]





Yes, I did. In fact, I tried a full install from scratch in a new test directory :
 511  git clone git://github.com/zeromq/libzmq.git
 512  cd libzmq/
 513  ./autogen.sh
 514  ./configure
 515  make check



Le 11/09/2013 15:46,
[email protected] a écrit :

    Did you re-run autogen.sh?  I made some changes so you need to re-run that I think.

    Ric.


    Inactive hide details for "Laurent Alebarde"
          ---11/09/2013 02:44:21 PM---Thanks Pieter. I am watching it
          now. It is up to me to"Laurent Alebarde" ---11/09/2013 02:44:21 PM---Thanks Pieter. I am watching it now. It is up to me to appology, I  should have thought about it ;-)

    From:
    "Laurent Alebarde" <[email protected]>
    To:
    "ZeroMQ development list" <[email protected]>,
    Date:
    11/09/2013 02:44 PM
    Subject:
    [zeromq-dev] cannot build last libzmq from Git
    Sent by:
    [email protected]



    Thanks Pieter. I am watching it now. It is up to me to appology, I should have thought about it ;-) .

    Now, I have a problem with building the last libzmq :

    make[1]: *** No rule to make target `test_ctx_destroy.c', needed by `test_ctx_destroy.o'.  Stop.
    make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
    make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/opt/libzmq/tests'
    make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1


    Le 11/09/2013 15:15, Pieter Hintjens a écrit :
      Update libzmq master, there's a change there which is significant. It
      was authenticating NULL-security sockets all the time, which caused
      problems. The latest master only authenticates NULL-security sockets
      if you also set a domain on the socket. So what you're seeing in the
      libcurve test is a request for a NULL authentication. The code asserts
      because that is impossible when things are working properly.

      Sorry for the confusion. Building from GitHub is always a little
      nasty. As a general rule for in-development work like libcurve, you
      want to track dependent projects like libzmq and CZMQ and grab them
      whenever they change.

      As soon as we can release libzmq/4.0, I'll add that version check to
      libcurve so it's clear.


      On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:51 PM,  
      <[email protected]> wrote:
        Hi,

        The last merge builds, but curve_selftest fails for me :

        * curve_keypair: OK
        * curve_keystore: OK
        curve_selftest: curve_codec.c:1031: zap_authenticator: Assertion
        `(!__extension__ ({ size_t __s1_len, __s2_len; (__builtin_constant_p
        ((mechanism)) && __builtin_constant_p (("CURVE")) && (__s1_len = strlen
        ((mechanism)), __s2_len = strlen (("CURVE")), (!((size_t)(const void
        *)(((mechanism)) + 1) - (size_t)(const void *)((mechanism)) == 1) || __s1_len >=
        4) && (!((size_t)(const void *)((("CURVE")) + 1) - (size_t)(const void
        *)(("CURVE")) == 1) || __s2_len >= 4)) ? __builtin_strcmp ((mechanism),
        ("CURVE")) : (__builtin_constant_p ((mechanism)) && ((size_t)(const void
        *)(((mechanism)) + 1) - (size_t)(const void *)((mechanism)) == 1) && (__s1_len =
        strlen ((mechanism)), __s1_len < 4) ? (__builtin_constant_p (("CURVE")) &&
        ((size_t)(const void *)((("CURVE")) + 1) - (size_t)(const void *)(("CURVE")) ==
        1) ? __builtin_strcmp ((mechanism), ("CURVE")) : (__extension__ ({ __const
        unsigned char *__s2 = (__const unsigned char *) (__const char *) (("CURVE"));
        register int __result = (((__const unsigned char *) (__const char *)
        ((mechanism)))[0] - __s2[0]); if (__s1_len > 0 && __result == 0) { __result =
        (((__const unsigned char *) (__const char *) ((mechanism)))[1] - __s2[1]); if
        (__s1_len > 1 && __result == 0) { __result = (((__const unsigned char *)
        (__const char *) ((mechanism)))[2] - __s2[2]); if (__s1_len > 2 && __result ==
        0) __result = (((__const unsigned char *) (__const char *) ((mechanism)))[3] -
        __s2[3]); } } __result; }))) : (__builtin_constant_p (("CURVE")) &&
        ((size_t)(const void *)((("CURVE")) + 1) - (size_t)(const void *)(("CURVE")) ==
        1) && (__s2_len = strlen (("CURVE")), __s2_len < 4) ? (__builtin_constant_p
        ((mechanism)) && ((size_t)(const void *)(((mechanism)) + 1) - (size_t)(const
        void *)((mechanism)) == 1) ? __builtin_strcmp ((mechanism), ("CURVE")) :
        (__extension__ ({ __const unsigned char *__s1 = (__const unsigned char *)
        (__const char *) ((mechanism)); register int __result = __s1[0] - ((__const
        unsigned char *) (__const char *) (("CURVE")))[0]; if (__s2_len > 0 && __result
        == 0) { __result = (__s1[1] - ((__const unsigned char *) (__const char *)
        (("CURVE")))[1]); if (__s2_len > 1 && __result == 0) { __result = (__s1[2] -
        ((__const unsigned char *) (__const char *) (("CURVE")))[2]); if (__s2_len > 2
        && __result == 0) __result = (__s1[3] - ((__const unsigned char *) (__const char
        *) (("CURVE")))[3]); } } __result; }))) : __builtin_strcmp ((mechanism),
        ("CURVE"))))); }))' failed.
        * curve_codec: /bin/sh: line 5: 30264 Aborted                 ${dir}$tst
        FAIL: curve_selftest

        Any idea please ?
        _______________________________________________
        zeromq-dev mailing list

        [email protected]
        http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
      _______________________________________________
      zeromq-dev mailing list

      [email protected]
      http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
    _______________________________________________
    zeromq-dev mailing list

    [email protected]
    http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

    ===========================================================
    The information in this email is confidential, and is intended solely for the addressee(s).
    Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized and therefore prohibited.  If you are
    not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking
    any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
    ===========================================================



    _______________________________________________
    zeromq-dev mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

===========================================================
The information in this email is confidential, and is intended solely for the addressee(s). 
Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized and therefore prohibited.  If you are 
not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking 
any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
===========================================================


_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev


_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to