No problem et al. In general, I really love ZMQ, it teaches me always think towards finding most simple-and-effective solutions. But it's always "it depends" on what ppl mean under "clumsy way".
And when I originally wrote a code which has been sending correlation_id along inside message, after couple of weeks I reverted this, because this seemed to me so weird and ugly, and I had been inlighted like "hey! just create and destroy inproc sockets! they are cheap, they aren't tcp ones, so u are safe." But then I stucked with FD limit issue even for inproc, and got completely stucked. Well, now, after your clarification, I see how it should be. 2013/9/20 Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> > Sorry if I sound like I'm just telling you to RTFM, but this is a > common symptom when starting to learn 0MQ, trying to solve problems in > a clumsy way when there's a simpler way that you see when you've > internalized the way things work. There seems to be no alternative > except to work through it. > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
