I would agree with MinRK, the serialization of keys being more basic, and working on a JSON level would be very helpful in the long term over taking the ini format of zcert. Granted, the zcert ini format can be easily converted to a dict/hashmap which would make for a much easier underlying structure to work with.
Thomas S. Hatch | Founder, CTO 5272 South College Drive, Suite 301 | Murray, UT 84123 [email protected] | www.saltstack.com <http://saltstack.com/> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 5:44 PM, MinRK <[email protected]> wrote: > zcert is probably useful for dealing with metadata *about* keypairs, but > the main thing that I think is helpful for bindings is the simple wrap of > `crypto_box_keypair` so that keypairs can be created without having to link > libsodium separately. For instance, if I were to make a cert like czmq's > with metadata in Python, I would just use the keypair generation and a > Python dict, then serialize to whatever common format (yaml, json, etc.). > > -MinRK > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
