Someone should add it clearly to the wiki, yes. It might be good to provide language-specific sections on the Download page for the main languages at least.
It's mentioned on https://github.com/zeromq/jzmq. it's as official as any other ZeroMQ project, part of our organization, and there has been considerable work to make JeroMQ and JZMQ use the same API so you can switch between them painlessly. On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Artem Vysochyn <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Pieter, > > JeroMQ. I was on http://zeromq.org/bindings:java and could not find > any info on JeroMQ. > Q: is this offcially maintained zmq java binding/port/whatever? > > > Thanks > > 2013/10/1 Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]>: >> Nick, >> >> The general advice is to use JeroMQ to start with and move to JZMQ >> later when / if you need it. >> >> -Pieter >> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Lun, Nicholas <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> >>> >>> I wanted to ask your opinion on JeroMQ as an alternative to the Java binding >>> you have available. Performance-wise it is my understanding that the C >>> library will be as fast or faster, but I find the maintenance easier since >>> JeroMQ is easier to upgrade. What are your opinions? >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Nick >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
