On 6 October 2013 16:24, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Steven McCoy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> - extend the following tcp uri format by adding an optionnal local port
> =>
> >> tcp://serveradress:serverport:localport
> > This is clearly breaking the format, so not valid.
>
> I think this would be backwards compatible, wouldn't it?
>

Well it all depends on how strict one wants it to conform to an URL.  I've
spent an hour or so trying to find precedence but cannot find anything
other than additional APIs.

There are deployment questions how does one scale or implement fault
tolerance when looking at a generic case.  I'm struggling to find worth
above implementing PAT in the local firewall.

-- 
Steve-o
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to