On 16 October 2013 06:11, Bjorn Reese <[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');> > wrote:
> Alternatively, we could upgrade to C++11 and get a portable solution > with std::chrono::steady_clock > > http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/chrono/steady_clock > > You can actually just look at the implementation for the clock and be surprised at what function they are using. Similarly with Boost::chrono, I filed a ticket with that one but to not much avail for monotonic correctness. -- Steve-o
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
