I agree with that - keep the base library small ... Am 29.10.2013 11:04, schrieb Peter Kleiweg: > Pieter Hintjens schreef op de 29e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2013: > > I think these kind of things are more for applications. There, > you determine what the regular patterns are, and you write > tiny utility functions that wrap these in a single call. > > But what those typical patterns are depends on the application, > so I don't think this belongs in the library. At least not in > the C library. > > Language bindings for languages that work usually on a more > abstract level could provide higher level functionality. For > instance, for my Go binding, there is no setsockoption or > getsockoption. There's a separate function for each option > (which also works well with the godoc system), and there are > even some more higher level functions. > >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
