On 11/11/2013 12:55 AM, Samuele Carli wrote: > On 11/10/2013 09:12 PM, Bruno D. Rodrigues wrote: >> I'm unable to test this but as I see a sleep 0.5 and a constant delay >> increase of 1sec I'd suggest the receiver to instead of sleeping a >> fixed time, to poll, with a timeout value until the next tick. That >> way if the receive and your code takes 0.75s, the poll can Sleep only >> Up to 0.25s, but more importamtly, consume the Messages already on the >> air. >> >
Ah sorry I forgot to mention, the log I pasted was recorded using a receiver delay of 1 second instead of 0.5 as shown in the code snippet, as you correctly noticed! Sorry for the confusion. Cheers, Sam -- |-- | Samuele Carli |-- | Contacts: | | Home page : www.csspace.net | E-mail : carlisamuele _at_ csspace.net | Icq : 60401601 | Skype : wohthan | jabber/gtalk: [email protected] (no emails here!) |-- _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
