Hi Christian

Well, it's stuck in zmq::mailbox_t::recv {int rc = signaler.wait (timeout_);}. 
Note that this is the first message of a newly created socket I'trying to 
queue. The architecture is a bit more complex, see my reply to Pieters mail.
Ah, also note that the send fail only in about 90% of the times I start the 
application. In the other 10% it runs just fine. Also note that everything is 
fine once I set ZMQ_REQ_RELAXED to false.

I also tried to make a minimal version that I could post, but the minimal 
version works of course...

Best regards 
Björn



        libzmq.dll!zmq::signaler_t::wait(int timeout_)  Line 213        C++
>       libzmq.dll!zmq::mailbox_t::recv(zmq::command_t * cmd_, int timeout_)  
> Line 72 + 0xb bytes       C++
        libzmq.dll!zmq::socket_base_t::process_commands(int timeout_, bool 
throttle_)  Line 901 C++
        libzmq.dll!zmq::socket_base_t::send(zmq::msg_t * msg_, int flags_)  
Line 722 + 0xd bytes        C++
        libzmq.dll!zmq_msg_send(zmq_msg_t * msg_, void * s_, int flags_)  Line 
593 + 0x1b bytes C++

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christian Kamm
Sent: Dienstag, 19. November 2013 06:11
To: ZeroMQ development list
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] Can't get ZMQ_REQ_RELAXED to run

A stack trace of the process when zmq_msg_send() blocks could already be 
telling. It sounds like it's getting stuck in either pipe::terminate() or 
dealer::xrecv()...

Cheers,
Christian

Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi Björn,
>
>The best thing when it comes to specific functionalities like this is a 
>minimal test case that shows the problem.
>
>-Pieter
>
>On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Björn Kuhlbrodt 
><[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I' trying to use the new (4.0.1) ZMQ_REQ_RELAXED in C++ with VS2010 (and the 
>> standard C-Binding from the 0MQ main site), but keep failing.
>>
>> What I have:
>> One context with two ZMQ_REQ sockets in two different threads, one binds and 
>> answers to REQs, one connects and sends REQs. This runs fine and nice until 
>> one system crashes before answering a REQ - a known Problem of the REQ-REP.
>>
>> What I tried:
>> I'm not too eager to kill the context to get the REQ-REP running again, 
>> because that would kill my other socket too. The new ZMQ_REQ_RELAXED came in 
>> very handy, just fit to solve the problem.
>>
>> BUT:
>> Now the zmq_msg_send(...)-Method fails to return after a few packages (or 
>> even for the first packet) while the client is up and waiting for packages, 
>> yes even actively communicating with the server over the other socket. I 
>> tried ZMQ_REQ_CORRELATE on and off - doesn't make a change. Tried 
>> ZMQ_REQ_RELAXED off again - everything works (except in crash-case).
>>
>> So my question:
>> Anyone here tried the ZMQ_REQ_RELAXED? Any idea? I'm willing to post code, 
>> but I'd need to extract the crucial parts, which could take a while.
>>
>> Regards
>> Bjorn
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dr. Björn Kuhlbrodt
>> Senior Software Developer
>> GP Inspect GmbH
>>
>> Tel: +49 89 750778 4729
>> Fax: +49 89 750778 4710
>> Mail: [email protected]
>>
>> GP Inspect GmbH | Hainbuchenring 9-11 | 82061 Neuried | Deutschland 
>> Geschäftsführer | Christian Probst, Dr. Eric Rüland, Enis Ersü, 
>> Martin Heinrich Amtsgericht München | HRB 173887
>>
>> A company of ISRA VISION Group
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------------------------------- This e-mail may contain material 
>> that is confidential, privileged and for the sole use of the intended 
>> recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or 
>> forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you 
>> are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete 
>> all copies. GP Inspect GmbH, ISRA VISION AG, its branches and subsidiaries 
>> herewith exclude any liability for third-party information recognizably 
>> contained in this email or its attachments. Third-party information does not 
>> necessarily reflect the opinion of GP Inspect GmbH or ISRA VISION AG.
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------
>> WWW.GPSOLAR.COM
>>
>> WWW.ISRAVISION.COM
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------------------------------- 
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
>
>--
>-
>Pieter Hintjens
>CEO of iMatix.com
>Founder of ZeroMQ community
>blog: http://hintjens.com
>_______________________________________________
>zeromq-dev mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to