zmrp ? Do you mean RFC ?

Le 29/11/2013 16:42, Pieter Hintjens a écrit :

So to make this work in libzmq you would have to add explicit proxy semantics to zmrp and implement in libzmq. Much like http proxying. It is a major project. Doable technically.

On Nov 29, 2013 3:37 PM, "Laurent Alebarde" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    It means exactly what I wrote in my first message : proxying
    CURVE. Let me copy/paste it here:

    CLIENT (CURVE) ------- (NULL) PROXY (NULL) ---------- (CURVE) WORKER

    With the following constraints on the proxy: it SHALL be
    ROUTER/ROUTER, and SHALL maintain a table that assign on client
    always to the same worker for the socket TTL.

    So it makes sense. It has several advantages: load balance
    handchecks, enable heavier mechanisms, hide the handcheck in
    workers, behind the front-end.

    I am going to test some additional options to distinguish the
    socket mechanism option from the puplished one (the one
    communicated on the wire to the peer), so that both client and
    worker can use CURVE, but exhibit NULL to the proxy. Of course,
    the proxy here is not proxy.cpp, but a special proxy taking into
    account the constraints depicted above.

    CLIENT (CURVE)(NULL) ------- (NULL) RR_PROXY (NULL) ----------
    (NULL) (CURVE) WORKER

    If it works, are you interested by a pull request ? Of course,
    default beheviour will be unchanged.

    Cheers,


    Laurent.


    P.S. : I am not used to eating my feet. The idea is just disgusting.


    Le 29/11/2013 15:16, Pieter Hintjens a écrit :
    On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Laurent Alebarde<[email protected]>  
<mailto:[email protected]>  wrote:

    I don't want to use raw TCP, and I would prefer sticking to libzmq. So, I
    raise the question: wouldn't it be a good idea to be able to proxy CURVE as
    depicted below ? Is it today impossible as a design choice to avoid misuse ?
    How can a CURVE peer talk to a NULL peer? What does that even mean?
    It's like asking whether you can eat with your foot... even if you put
    the words together, it is nonsensical. It's not disabled by design.

    -Pieter
    _______________________________________________
    zeromq-dev mailing list
    [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev


    _______________________________________________
    zeromq-dev mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev



_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to