On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:23 PM, KIU Shueng Chuan <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) yes, needed. > 2) yes, it should. After the move, the origin message returns to an init-ed > state. You could get away with not closing, but in my opinion that relies on > knowing the underlying implementation. > 3) yes. However in this case, closing the origin message is mandatory. > (Unless you also know that very short messages are copied and not shared)
Would you like to make a patch to the man page? > I implemented a simple multi part message c++ wrapper using the move and > copy functions. > https://github.com/pijyoi/msg_parts/blob/master/msg_parts.hpp Consider adding this to the C++ high level binding... (we may also want to rename that to cppzmq, and move the current cppzmq .h file back into libzmq). -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
