On 12 Dec 2013, at 12:43 am, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Andrew Hume <[email protected]> wrote: > >> i’ve just switched to using poller and wanted to verify my “pattern”. >> i have 4 incoming sockets. 3 are (very) low volume but need low latency >> the other socket is high volume where (almost) any latency will do. >> >> my pattern is to initialize the poller with the high volume socket last, >> but when i get a hit on that socket, i read up to 100 messages before >> going back to polling. >> >> is there a better way to do this? > > Sounds right. The order that you register sockets won't be significant > IMO (worth measuring). On all systems (but OS/X specifically), you > will win by doing non-blocking reads until there are no messages left, > and only then switch to polling. Does this mean that the readable state on a poller might not be updated if there are other sockets in the poll set that are already readable (have messages in queue)? -Matt _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
