Agreeing with Bruno

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Bruno D. Rodrigues <
[email protected]> wrote:

> all implementation shall talk to all implementations without issues, or
> else report a bug and provide a fix ;)
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2013, at 13:01, Dmitriy Vsekhvalnov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Doron.
>
> How about NetMQ to JeroMQ?
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Doron Somech <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dmitriy,
>>
>> NetMQ can talk to ZeroMQ, just make sure you are using the latest version
>> available on nuget (and leave the the Endian setting as Big).
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Doron
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Dmitriy Vsekhvalnov <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, that is what is worrying me as well (no commits).
>>>
>>> Thanks, Matt !
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Matt Connolly <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I haven’t had any problems. I recently switched from clrzmq to NetMQ
>>>> and I’m talking to ruby processes using the rbczmq gem (which I chose
>>>> because it was faster and more ruby-like in its implementation than the
>>>> ruby-ffi zmq gem).
>>>>
>>>> I can’t speak for the maintainers of clrzmq. There have been no commits
>>>> in over a year in here: https://github.com/zeromq/clrzmq
>>>>
>>>> -Matt
>>>>
>>>> On 11 Dec 2013, at 10:12 pm, Dmitriy Vsekhvalnov <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is it compatible with zeromq? I mean i can interop from C# side using
>>>> netmq to ruby-ffi with native zeromq and vice versa?
>>>>
>>>> Officially it means native zeromq binding to CLR is dead?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Matt Connolly <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> NetMQ is a native C# implementation that appears more active than
>>>>> clrzmq:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/zeromq/netmq
>>>>>
>>>>> -Matt
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11 Dec 2013, at 9:39 pm, Dmitriy Vsekhvalnov <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> trying to get an idea if clrzmq (https://github.com/zeromq/clrzmq) is
>>>>> supported or not anymore. It doesn't seem to support latest v4.x release.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If not supported any alternates?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to