Hi, >clrZMQ is extremely outdated, wouldn't it be a better idea to use NetMQ for >this instead ?
pyzmq in its core is based on libzmq implementation and provides mechanism (backend) to for alternative libzmq. clrzmq provides all P/Invoke infrastructure for libzmq I was looking for. I have assumed that NetMQ is not 1:1 API equivalent of libzmq and I was not able to access effort to make it pyzmq usable. Is NetMQ api compatible with libzmq? It would make perfect sense for me to use pure .net library instead of libzmq with P/Invoke. >(Or, alternatively, update clrZMQ to the latest master) I am not sure what you mean by latest master. As far as I can tell my branch is based on the latest master of clrzmq. Can you explain? --pawel > > >On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Pawel Jasinski <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> hi, >> >> I have managed to get pyzmq to work under Ironpython. >> Anybody interested can take it from: >> https://github.com/paweljasinski/pyzmq/tree/iron >> >> At the moment implementation depends on modified version of clrzmq >> https://github.com/paweljasinski/clrzmq/tree/iron >> >> It is usable, but not in a "pull request" quality. >> >> I am not sure how should I go with the project structure. >> Ideally the clrzmq part needed by pyzmq could be separated and >> included as part of pyzmq. However they have difference licenses. >> >> Any feedback and suggestions are appreciated. >> _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
