On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Michael Haberler <[email protected]> wrote:
> no, let's have that sit a while until Pieter's latest changes shake out a > bit, and wrap those eventually Speaking of this, is there a description of the problem you were aiming to solve? I didn't see that anywhere. From the code it seems you were doing a request-reply over UDP. It's unclear to me why, and why this would not work e.g. over tcp://. As a general rule (and it's actually part of our process), it is necessary to explain the problem driving a change, either in a separate issue or in the pull request itself. That's how we can judge different solutions. Without a stated rationale, the code is almost by definition wrong. (The rationale may be obvious, but here it's not.) Cheers Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
