On 12/28/2013 11:25 AM, Arnaud Loonstra wrote: > On 12/28/2013 08:53 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Arnaud Loonstra <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Now node B is discoverd through eth1. It will receive a HELLO message >>> from Node A containing the ipaddress 192.168.1.10 however it should use >>> 192.168.2.10 instead. The two nodes can't finish their handshake. >> >> Why do you think node B will get a broadcast packet containing >> 192.168.1.10 as sender? Surely the broadcast happens on each interface >> separately? > [snip]
> So it's using the ipaddress from the ZRE message to connect to. I'm just > saying it would be more logical to use the source address of the > message. But again I might be missing something. Aargh.. of course... ZeroMQ has no way of passing the ipaddress of the receiver... There was some mentioning in the archives about adding it to the API. Did that ever get a follow up? Rg, Arnaud -- w: http://www.sphaero.org t: http://twitter.com/sphaero g: http://github.com/sphaero i: freenode: sphaero_z25 _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
