So I answer to myself: yes.
Le 30/12/2013 18:02, Laurent Alebarde a écrit :
Hi Devs,
In *test_stream.cpp*, the ZMQ_SNDMORE flag is tested on receive with:
rc = zmq_msg_recv (&identity, stream, 0);
assert (rc > 0);
assert (zmq_msg_more (&identity));
and is set with:
rc = zmq_msg_send (&identity, stream, ZMQ_SNDMORE);
I note that *zmq_msg_recv* / *zmq_msg_send* are used with the identity
where ZMQ_SNDMORE is set and tested, while for the message payload,
*zmq_send* / *zmq_recv* are used, but used without multipart.
So, my question is: Is it legitimate to use *zmq_send */*zmq_recv*
with multipart messages, and then to use:
rc = zmq_getsockopt (frontend, ZMQ_RCVMORE, &more, &moresz);
?
In my test with streamq-proxy where I am testing now multipart
messages, it fails, but I want to be sure from where the problem is.
Cheers,
Laurent
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
