On 12/31/2013 07:08 PM, Drew Crawford wrote: > I think I can supply a patch that is at least good enough to get cleaned up > and merged by a zmq dev. The open question at this point is which way the > correlation should get resolved. One possibility is to populate the ZAP > identity with the router identity instead of the empty string. Another > possibility is to populate the userid from ZAP somewhere in the router. > There are other possibilities that have not occurred to me. > > I know enough to make a run at any of these, but not enough to identify the > best solution from the set of options. I’m hoping a dev can pop out of the > woodwork and identify which solution is the one that should be tried. >
Drew, this is the light at the end of the tunnel :) I wish you luck ! Cheers, Nicolas _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
