On 3 Jan 2014, at 7:48 am, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: > Seconds is fine for this case but surprising overall since all other > durations in the API are in msec. >
> I'm not sure what you mean about backwards compatibility. > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Alex Grönholm <[email protected]> > wrote: >> 02.01.2014 15:59, Pieter Hintjens kirjoitti: >>> It makes sense, and I'd try this; the timeout should be in msec, to be >>> consistent with other duration arguments. You can take any of the >>> existing socket options like ZMQ_SNDBUF as a template, and make a pull >>> request. >> Wouldn't it be enough to document that the values are expressed in >> seconds and not ms? For my two cents, I’d prefer all “time” measurements in an API to be in consistent units. -Matt _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
