My point is not to create a new document, but to :
1) put the RFC inside the libzmq repository
2) add flags to each requirement

The RFC is a very usefull document and it would be nice have the whole (lib + doc + rfc) in perfect sync.

My 2 cts.

Le 15/01/2014 11:17, Pieter Hintjens a écrit :
It's explained in the RFC, in fact, what features are not implemented
in libzmq master. As for older versions of ZeroMQ, they either
implement older RFCs (fully), or previous drafts of ZMTP v3. The
libzmq man pages for any version are the definitive reference for any
given version of libzmq.

If you want to make additional documentation about what's implemented,
where, feel free to make it: we have a wiki exactly for that.



On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Laurent Alebarde <[email protected]> wrote:
That would be nice to have the RFCs inside libzmq git repository with a
status for each requirement if it is implemented or not. So when we check
out any version, we know easily what is in and what is not.


Le 15/01/2014 01:27, Victor Perron a écrit :

WHAT ! give me my money back ! :)


On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote:
We haven't implemented resources yet...

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Mirjam Friesen <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi,

I like the concept of virtual addressing as described here:
http://hintjens.com/blog:39#toc11. As I understand ZMTP 3.0 I can use
resources to generate virtual addressing. So I did a little play around with
libzmq 4.0.2. which should implement ZMTP 3.0.
It was possible to bind a socket to "tcp://*:5555/myaddress" and connect
another one to "tcp://localhost:5555/myaddress, well so far.
My Problem is I can connect a socket to
"tcp://localhost:5555/somethingelse" and it looks like it also connects to
the first resource. I got the impression, that the resources were simply
ignored. Did I understand it wrong?

I would be happy, if someone could explain how to use resources.

Mirjam
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev



--
Victor


_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev



_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to