On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Greg Ward <[email protected]> wrote: > Would it make sense for pyzmq to wrap CZMQ as well?
Mirroring other languages, what we see is a bootstrap phase where wrapping C helps us get off the ground, yet where the long term profit comes from rewriting the functionality in the developer's language. This is what we're seeing in Java, C#, even Erlang. CZMQ was, is, meant to prototype higher-level concepts. The valuable thing for users is that our domain language is consistent. So a "frame" vs. a "message", so an "authentication handler", a "certificate" mean the same and are interoperable. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
